MASTERMINDFREE TERMINAL免费终端
Calculator计算器

Inflation & Purchasing Power Calculator

See what money is worth over time: enter an amount, an annual inflation rate and years to get future cost, purchasing power and total erosion.

Live calculator实时计算

Enter an amount, an annual inflation rate and a number of years. You get what that same basket will cost later, and what today’s money will actually be worth once prices have climbed.填入一笔金额、年通胀率和年数,即可得到——同样一篮子商品未来的价格,以及在物价上涨之后,今天这笔钱实际还值多少。

future cost未来成本

Fill in all three fields to see how prices and purchasing power move.填入三个字段,即可看到价格与购买力的变化。

Purchasing power购买力
Value lost损失价值
Erosion侵蚀比例
Total price rise价格总涨幅
Copied已复制

Money loses value when prices rise. Multiply an amount by (1 + inflation) for each year and you get the future cost — what the same basket of goods will run later. Divide instead and you get purchasing power — what today’s amount will actually buy after prices have climbed. Same rate, opposite directions.当物价上涨时,货币会贬值。把一笔金额按每年 (1 + 通胀率) 连乘,得到的是未来成本——同样一篮子商品日后要花的钱。反过来相除,得到的是购买力——在物价上涨之后,今天这笔钱实际能买到的东西。同一个利率,方向相反。

01The formula公式

Future cost = Amount × (1 + i ÷ 100)n未来成本 = 金额 × (1 + i ÷ 100)n
Purchasing power = Amount ÷ (1 + i ÷ 100)n购买力 = 金额 ÷ (1 + i ÷ 100)n
Erosion = 100 × ( 1 − 1 ÷ (1 + i ÷ 100)n )侵蚀比例 = 100 × ( 1 − 1 ÷ (1 + i ÷ 100)n )
where i = annual inflation %, n = years其中 i = 年通胀率 %,n = 年数

Notice that erosion is never quite as large as the price rise. If prices climb 34%, purchasing power does not fall 34% — it falls to 1 ÷ 1.34, a loss closer to 25%. The two percentages describe the same gap seen from opposite ends, and the smaller one is always the drop in what your money buys.请注意,侵蚀比例永远不会和价格涨幅一样大。如果物价上涨 34%,购买力并不会下降 34%——而是降到 1 ÷ 1.34,损失更接近 25%。这两个百分比从相反的两端描述同一段差距,而其中较小的那个,始终是你的钱所能购买之物的下降幅度。

02A worked example一个算例

Worked example算例

Suppose a basket costs $1,000 today, inflation runs 3% a year, and we look 10 years ahead.假设一篮子商品今天价值 $1,000,通胀率为每年 3%,我们展望 10 年之后。

  • Growth factor = (1.03)10 = 1.3439增长系数 = (1.03)10 = 1.3439
  • Future cost = 1,000 × 1.3439 = $1,343.92未来成本 = 1,000 × 1.3439 = $1,343.92
  • Purchasing power = 1,000 ÷ 1.3439 = $744.09购买力 = 1,000 ÷ 1.3439 = $744.09
  • Erosion = 100 × (1 − 744.09 ÷ 1,000) ≈ 25.6% — prices rose 34%, buying power fell 25.6%.侵蚀比例 = 100 × (1 − 744.09 ÷ 1,000) ≈ 25.6%——物价上涨 34%,购买力下降 25.6%。

So $1,000 stuffed in a drawer for a decade would still read “$1,000”, but it would stretch like $744 does now. The dollar figure never changed; what it commands did. That silent gap is what inflation actually costs.所以,把 $1,000 塞进抽屉存放十年,上面依然写着「$1,000」,但它的购买力只相当于今天的 $744。数字从未改变,改变的是它能买到什么。这段无声的差距,正是通胀真正的代价。

03The common trap常见陷阱

Subtracting the rate instead of compounding it用减法代替连乘

A frequent shortcut is to take “3% a year for 10 years” and subtract 30% of purchasing power. But inflation compounds — each year’s rise stacks on a base already lifted by the year before — so the price rise is 34%, not 30%. And because purchasing power is the reciprocal, the drop is 25.6%, not 30% either. Over long horizons or high rates the gap between the quick subtraction and the real math grows wide enough to change a plan.一个常见的捷径是把「每年 3%、共 10 年」直接减去 30% 的购买力。但通胀是连乘的——每一年的上涨都叠加在前一年已经抬高的基础之上——所以价格涨幅是 34%,而非 30%。又因为购买力是其倒数,下降幅度是 25.6%,同样不是 30%。在较长的时间跨度或较高的利率下,这种快速减法与真实计算之间的差距会大到足以改变一个计划。

04Where this breaks它的局限

This tool assumes one steady rate every year, which real inflation never obeys. A few honest limits:本工具假设每年都是一个稳定的利率,而真实的通胀从不遵守这一点。几点诚实的局限:

  • A single average rate. Real inflation swings year to year. Use a long-run average as a rough guide, not a forecast of any single future year.单一平均利率。真实通胀逐年波动。请把长期平均值当作粗略参照,而非对某一具体未来年份的预测。
  • Your basket isn’t the index. Headline inflation is an average across many goods. Rent, tuition and healthcare can run far hotter than the number, so your personal erosion may differ.你的篮子不是指数。公布的通胀是许多商品的平均值。房租、学费和医疗的涨幅可能远高于这个数字,因此你个人感受到的侵蚀可能不同。
  • It ignores what the money earns. This is purchasing power on idle cash. Money invested at a return above inflation grows in real terms — the erosion here is the hurdle a return has to clear, not a verdict on saving.它忽略了资金的收益。这里算的是闲置现金的购买力。以高于通胀的回报进行投资的资金,其实际价值是增长的——此处的侵蚀是回报必须跨越的门槛,而非对储蓄的评判。
The one line to remember记住这一句

Inflation doesn’t shrink the number on the bill — it shrinks what the number can buy. Judge cash by its purchasing power, not its face value.通胀不会缩小账单上的数字——它缩小的是这个数字能买到什么。衡量现金要看它的购买力,而非它的面值。

See how a return can outrun inflation with the compounding calculator复利计算器, or turn two values into a growth rate with the 看看回报如何跑赢通胀,或用 CAGR calculator年化增长率计算器.把两个数值换算成增长率。