Raymond James Sell-side卖方

Weekly economics thoughts of the week

Sep 19, 202613 pages

From the report报告摘录Fed Policy Ambiguity Amidst Restrictive Signals: FOMC SEP and dot plot revisions create uncertainty on policy reaction function, with reduced explicit guidance complicating inflation-targeting framework despite claims…

Inside the report报告内文 Verbatim from the original PDF — first pages原版 PDF 开篇原文 · 逐字摘录

Eugenio J. Alemán, PhD, Chief Economist Giampiero Fuentes, CFP®, Economist Matthew Ziyadeh, CFA, Investment Strategy Analyst

Trying to Decipher the Fed This week's FOMC decision was largely in line with expectations. While many market participants and Fed members anticipated another rate increase later this year, we remained in the camp that viewed the move as likely the last increase before the Fed adopted a wait-and-see approach, allowing geopolitical developments to stabilize and recent inflationary base effects related to the US-Iran war to fade.

What was less expected was the degree of uncertainty created by the updated Summary of Economic Projections (SEP), the dot plot, and the Chairman's press conference. Although we understand the Chairman's intention to reduce reliance on explicit forward guidance, eliminating guidance while simultaneously publishing the SEP and dot plot, and then distancing himself from those projections during the press conference, risks complicating rather than simplifying monetary policy communication. Under an inflation-targeting framework, clarity regarding the policy reaction function remains essential.

The Chairman argued that the Fed continues to remove monetary accommodation. Yet many measures suggest that monetary policy was already restrictive prior to the latest rate increase.

Household balance sheets provide one example. Total household debt has increased only modestly in nominal terms and has declined in real terms over the past year. This pattern is evident across most major categories. Credit card balances have risen in nominal terms but are essentially flat after adjusting for inflation, while mortgage and auto debt have posted outright declines in real terms. Rather than leveraging up, households continue to deleverage, a dynamic more consistent with restrictive financial conditions than accommodative monetary policy.1 Total Debt Balance Credit Card Debt Balance 12% 20% 10% 15% 8% 6% 10% .’4% 5% 2% 0% 0% -2% -5% -4% -6% -10% -8% % Total (YoY) Inflation-Adjusted (YoY) Credit Card (YoY) Inflation-Adjusted (YoY) Source: RJ Economics, FactSet, data as of 9/18/2026 1 We typically like to look at these series in real terms, that is, taking inflation out of the equation, to see what is happening to

these series without the distortion from inflation. In the graph we include both, year-over-year changes in nominal and real debt levels.

Mortgage Debt Balance Auto Debt Balance 15% 15%

Mortgage (YoY) Inflation-Adjusted (YoY) Auto Loan (YoY) Inflation-Adjusted (YoY) Source: RJ Economics, FactSet, data as of 9/18/2026

At the same time, household financial conditions remain relatively healthy. Measures of household financial soundness, particularly relative to income, do not suggest excessive financial stress despite elevated borrowing costs.

The income side of the household balance sheet, however, remains subdued. Growth in both nominal and real disposable personal income has been weak on a year-over-year basis. Historically, such softness has been more characteristic of periods surrounding economic downturns than of an economy expanding above potential. The disconnect helps explain why many households have not fully participated in the benefits of the current expansion, a reality reflected in both consumer sentiment and consumer confidence measures. Real vs Nominal Disposable Income (Year-Over-Year %) 40 20

-10 -30 '97 '99 '01 '03 '05 '07 '09 '11 '13 '15 '17 '19 '21 '23 '25 Nominal Disposable Personal Income (YoY) Real Disposable Personal Income (YoY) Recession Periods - United States

Source: RJ Economics, FactSet, data as of 9/18/2026

Read the full report + PDF阅读全文与 PDF

The full summary (5 key points) and the original Raymond James PDF are for MastermindX Pro members. 完整摘要(5 个要点)与 Raymond James 原始 PDF 为 MastermindX Pro 会员专享。

Read on MastermindX前往 MastermindX 阅读

Related institutional research相关机构研报

Not investment advice. MastermindX hosts third-party institutional research for reference and education; ratings and views are the authors', not ours. Browse the full Research Vault → 非投资建议。MastermindX 仅收录第三方机构研究,供参考与学习;其中评级与观点均属作者本人。浏览完整研报库 →