Other IND

Diversification

Aug 2, 202613 pages

From the report报告摘录60/40 Strategy Collapse: 2022 Sharpe ratio plummeted to 0.14 (vs.

Inside the report报告内文 Verbatim from the original PDF — first pages原版 PDF 开篇原文 · 逐字摘录

Allianz Research |28 July 2026

When bonds stop hedging equities: rethinking portfolio diversification Ludovic Subran In Summary Chief Investment Officer and Chief Economist • The 60/40 portfolio has quietly stopped working. The risk -adjusted return investors could reasonably expect from the standard balanced portfolio has fallen to roughly a third of its long -run level, from a Sharpe ratio of 0.47 to just 0.14, as bonds and equities Nils Bradtke Senior Investment Strategist have stopped hedging each other for the first time in a generation. Since mid -2022 , the two have moved together rather than apart, with the equity -bond correlation flipping to a positive +0.77, and no comparable episode in the past quarter -century Jordi Basco Carrera has behaved this way for anywhere near this long. Head of Priv ate Markets Investment Strategy • The culprit is policy uncertainty, not only inflation. The reassuring story that 2022 was a one -off inflation shock and that everything returns to normal once prices settle does not survive contact with the data. Inflation still matters, but it is no longer the master variable. Tariff policy, geopolitical fra gmentation and the slow erosion of central bank credibility are now doing the heavy lifting. • Gold, private credit and infrastructure are the diversifiers doing the work now. Where government bonds have failed to catch equity drawdowns since 2022, three asset classes have quietly stepped into their place. Gold has delivered positive risk - adjusted returns in nearly every regime tested and is the closest thing to an all - weather hedge . Private credit is posting its strongest showing on record. Infrastructure has held up across both this cycle and calmer ones before it, a rare cross -regime performer. • A regime -robust 'No -Regret' portfolio , built to work across cycles rather than optimized for the current one, roughly doubles the risk -adjusted return of a standard global benchmark . It delivers a Sharpe ratio of 1. 33 against the benchmark's 0.5 9, compounds an initial dollar to roughly 9x its starting value over two decades against just 5x for the benchmark and cuts the deepest drawdown in the sample from −24.6% to −1 5.3%. The composition marks a substantial departure from tradition: government bonds are cut from roughly 20% of the benchmark to under 4% and public equities from 43% to 1 3%, funding materially larger allocations to gold (16%), private credit (2 9%) and private equity ( 16%), with a smaller residual position in infrastructure . • The historical hedge will return only once policy uncertainty resolves and inflation is fully re -anchored, and rate cuts alone will not do it. Only two of the five preconditions for a durable return to negative equity -bond correlation are true binding constraints, and neither is something a central bank can deliver on its own. Genuine resolution likely requires a durable Iran settlement and a mo re stable US trade regime, and both look like multi year propositions rather than near term fixes . The remaining conditions, on monetary and liquidity settings, equity valuations and the yield curve, follow mechanically once the first two are in place.

How 2022 snapped t he 60/40 strategy For two decades, the 60/40 portfolio did something rather remarkable : it made the difficult look dull. The formula was straightforward. Sixty cents of every dollar bought equities, which supplied the long -run growth. The other 40 went into government bonds, which stood by, patiently, waiting to catch the fall. When equities dropped, as they periodically did, bonds duly rose. Growth scares brought rate cuts, rate cuts pushed bond prices up and the 40% sleeve absorbed a decent share of the equity pain. Invest ors could speak, without embarrassment, of a portfolio that returned around 7% a year with the volatility of a mid -cap stock and the drama of an accountancy conference.

But i t was a convention, not a law of nature. Yet it held often enough, and for long enough, that the entire architecture of modern retirement finance came to be built on top of it. Liability -matched pension books assumed it. Target -date funds mechanized it. An industry of insurance…

Read the full report + PDF阅读全文与 PDF

The full summary (5 key points) and the original Other PDF are for MastermindX Pro members. 完整摘要(5 个要点)与 Other 原始 PDF 为 MastermindX Pro 会员专享。

Read on MastermindX前往 MastermindX 阅读

Related institutional research相关机构研报

Not investment advice. MastermindX hosts third-party institutional research for reference and education; ratings and views are the authors', not ours. Browse the full Research Vault → 非投资建议。MastermindX 仅收录第三方机构研究,供参考与学习;其中评级与观点均属作者本人。浏览完整研报库 →