Goldman Sachs Sell-side卖方

India Energy HPCL BPCL Tough 1Q

Jul 24, 2026

From the report报告摘录HPCL/BPCL Q1 Earnings Divergence: Mixed results driven by Russian crude mix (38% for BPCL), inventory losses (HPCL), and Vizag issues; BPCL beat via stronger refining margins.

Inside the report报告内文 Verbatim from the original PDF — first pages原版 PDF 开篇原文 · 逐字摘录

Equity Research 24 July 2026 | 9:22AM SGT

HPCL/BPCL: Tough 1Q; Higher oil prices again top of mind, but not fully priced into shares; remain Neutral

HPCL and BPCL’s 1Q results were mixed, reporting earnings miss and beat Nikhil Bhandari | respectively, as the latter reported significantly stronger refining margins. HPCL’s 1Q Goldman Sachs (Singapore) Pte loss represented ~20% of FY26 book value. The divergence in strong refining print at Randy Lau BPCL vs HPCL was potentially due to (1) higher mix of discounted Russian crude | Goldman Sachs (Singapore) Pte which constituted ~38% of BPCL’s procurement in 1Q besides new grades from Venezuela and Angola, (2) higher crude inventory losses at HPCL due to significant inventory holding at the end of 1Q which coincided with a sharp decline in oil prices, vs near normal crude inventory holding (~35 days) for BPCL, and (3) weaker refining capture at Vizag refinery of HPCL as the residue upgradation unit faced technical challenges alongside locational disadvantage resulting in higher crude premiums and crude inventory requirement.

We believe upside risks to oil prices (escalating geopolitical tensions) and further downside risks to marketing margins in coming quarters are again top of mind for investors. Our Commodities team sees two-sided oil price risks but skewed to the upside on net, especially in the near term where Brent could exceed US$120/bbl in Dec’26 quarter and average US$100/bbl in CY27 if Hormuz remains disrupted through CY27, with further upside if the Bab-al-Mandab Strait and Suez are also permanently disrupted. On the other hand, Brent might decline to the low US$60s by end-CY27 if supply exceeds our expectations and demand losses prove more persistent.

At current oil prices, our weekly EBITDA tracker suggests integrated refining and marketing earnings are likely back in negative territory. We estimate HPCL and BPCL shares are already pricing in a normalization of integrated margins assuming mid-cycle multiples. We do not see a compelling risk reward with 44%/46% up/downside in our bull / bear case scenarios on average for HPCL/BPCL. We cut estimates further in the near term, remain below Bloomberg consensus for FY27E EBITDA and broadly maintain our medium-term assumptions for both marketing margins (assumes normal margins by FY29E) and refining margins (above mid-cycle margins through FY29E). Remain Neutral rated on HPCL and BPCL.

Risk reward for HPCL/BPCL still not favourable; lower earnings and TP; remain Neutral We lower our FY27E-29E EBITDA forecasts especially for FY27E, mainly marking to

Goldman Sachs does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. For Reg AC certification and other important disclosures, see the Disclosure Appendix, or go to Analysts employed by non-US affiliates are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA in the U.S.

market weaker-than-expected marketing margins in 1Q (partially offset by higher refining margins for BPCL). Overall, we lower our FY28E based 12-month target prices for HPCL and BPCL by 7% and 1% respectively, mainly marking to market the higher FY27E net debt with lower earnings. We continue to value HPCL/BPCL on a SOTP basis, based on 6.5x FY28E EV/EBITDA to value the refining, marketing, petchem and pipeline businesses (assumptions unchanged).

Exhibit 1: We do not see a compelling risk reward with 44%/46% up/downside in our bull/bear case scenarios on average for HPCL/BPCL Bear Base Bull Below normal marketing Below normal marketing Normal marketing margins margin, upcycle refining margins and refining margins and upcycle refining margins margins (FY28E)

HPCL Implied Value (Rs) Theoretical upside/downside -57% -16% 38% Implied P/B 0.7X 1.2X 1.9X Core GRM (US$/bbl) $7.3 $9.3 $11.2 Core net marketing margin 1.1 1.3 1.9 Target multiple 6.5X 6.5X 6.5X

BPCL Implied Value (Rs) Theoretical upside/downside -34% 16% 50% Implied P/B 0.9X 1.5X 1.9X Core GRM (US$/bbl)…

Read the full report + PDF阅读全文与 PDF

The full summary (4 key points) and the original Goldman Sachs PDF are for MastermindX Pro members. 完整摘要(4 个要点)与 Goldman Sachs 原始 PDF 为 MastermindX Pro 会员专享。

Read on MastermindX前往 MastermindX 阅读

Related institutional research相关机构研报

Not investment advice. MastermindX hosts third-party institutional research for reference and education; ratings and views are the authors', not ours. Browse the full Research Vault → 非投资建议。MastermindX 仅收录第三方机构研究,供参考与学习;其中评级与观点均属作者本人。浏览完整研报库 →